The newspaper news (by Xiong Yan) reports a loss the credit card to the bank, the different bank collection reports a loss spends the difference to be actually big. The lowest 20 Yuan, the highest 85 Yuan, some must seperately gather 15 to 25 Yuan makes up the card expense. Little while ago, Haidian District’s Ms. Liu carelessly lost the wallet, inside has 2 credit cards.
She takes the hot line with these two bank’s guest to have the contact immediately. The inquiry knew that a credit card reports a loss the expense is 20 Yuan, makes up the card free.
Another card reports a loss the expense is 50 Yuan, makes up the card to spend 20 Yuan. Those who let her not be clear, is the credit card, why does the different bank’s charge differ that manyReporter carried on various bankcard tariff through the silver rate website quite to discover yesterday that in the ordinary credit card, the ICBC collection reported a loss spends cheaply, no matter were the double coin card or Shan Bika is 20 Yuan, has not gathered makes up the card expense. Guangdong develops the bank double coin card to report a loss spends high, is 85 Yuan. (various banks charge situation for details sees next table)The bank staff indicated that the collection expense uses in 3 aspects probably: First, after cardholder’s individual material checking, when uploads for the related credit card center, will produce certain expense; Second, the related expense which after the bank must bear the credit card reports a loss, produces; Third, makes up the card the expense.Reporter found that reports a loss the expense related department in view of Commercial bank’s credit card not to make the unification stipulation. Because various bank has the different service standard, undertakes the risk is also different, moreover various bank service’s client base is also different. For all this, reports a loss the credit card bank to differ four time of many charging criteria to let many cardholders accept with difficulty.

New China net Washington, May 12 – (by Liu Hong king Wei) US commerce secretary Luo Jiahui on 12th said that he leads US trade mission in visit to China period and the Chinese side Enterprise signs many cooperative agreements, these cooperations to both countries enterprises, the populace and the government will be the win-win results. Luo Jiahui at the press conference said in same day’s that some 24 American Enterprise will participate in trip which of the Chinese he on 15th starts, the delegation will visit places such as Hong Kong, Shanghai. First which after this is also the Austria Pama Government comes on stage, the US sends out the trade mission which leads by cabinet minister, the clean energy cooperation will be this visit key point.
Luo Jiahui indicated that China and US are win-win in the clean energy domain’s cooperation mutual benefit, can also give the US the Enterprise to create more profits and the employment opportunity, is also helpful in China raises the energy use efficiency. In issued before this in a statement, Luo Jiahui indicated that China is the US develops the clean energy domain the giant potential market, how the American economy’s future will depend on to maintain the competitive power, will satisfy in the 21st century to the clean energy unceasingly aggregate demand. He indicated that participates in US trade mission the enterprise leader understands the global competition the pressing.

Because steel pipe wall thickness is thin, the stress member’s intensity and the rigidity drop, achieves in with difficulty the technical program the overall stable request. Regarding this, Kunming An Jianju makes the administrative sanctions procedure is legitimate, punishment result reasonable legitimate.The accident project was evaluated once the fine projectThe plaintiff agent the language is astonishing in the court: the project has an accident preceding day, but also passes through the Department concerned to approve, is evaluated the fine project. We think not clearly, before having an accident, the experts saying that the project was qualified, belonged to the fine project, after having an accident, actually overall is overthrown, advanced on our body the responsibility. Who should come for this accident to be responsibleReporter Bai Li honest (spring city evening news)The plaintiff loose source good faith company protests we in the courtyard not to pay for the collapsing accidentYesterday when hearing, regarding makes the false intelligence, the use wai the material view, once the loose source good faith company which punished was thought the injustice: the engineerig material is we purchases, but the material quality checks by the upper formation contractor, after the material is the first party approves qualified, we only then use, we should not be the `Kunming New Airport approach span collapse the event ‘ `to pay ‘; But Kunming An Jianju answers arguing, the plaintiff forge intelligence illegal embraces lives, encounters the punishment reasonably legitimate.Plaintiff viewpointShould not pay for the collapsing accidentThe plaintiff agent thought: The loose source good faith company does not have the responsibility to this accident’s occurrence.
In the Kunming New Airport construction, the loose source good faith company has undertaken the support, the template and so on many work duties, may divide into each minor term specifically, when after each minor term work completes, after defers to the stipulation to propose the first party approves qualified, namely regards as loose source good faith company this work completes. In this accident, puts up the support for a quite independent work duty, puts up the support to complete and approves qualified after the first party, namely regards as this work the labor services exporting completes.

Because the newspaper news (by Liu Jun Reporter Li Xiaolei) the original Liuyang Lumber Company opens work place tree farm staff Tang the company to dismiss oneself incident, does not appeal for help many times the fruit. Yesterday, reporter learned that the Liuyang municipal party committee politics and law committee introduces the inquiry public hearing system, and other continued many year inquiry cases to this appealing for help event to carry on the open hearing together. It is reported that the event carries on the open hearing for the first time in Hunan this on the inquiry.
The staff is dismissed asks for the view ten years Tang is the original Liuyang Lumber Company opens the work place tree farm staff. The company aspect said that from December, 1992, Tang, in has not gone through any asking for leave formalities in the situation, went out to be absent from work without an excuse for 44 months, in 1996 is made by the city lumber company removes a name processing, and will process the notice to deliver his wife. However, Tang said that he in 2000 only then knew is dismissed by the company, and has not received any written notification, then makes to the company removes a name the decision to refuse to accept. Tang believed that oneself asking for leave time only then 20 days, after the leave of absence expires, has insisted went to work to July, 1994, because then the tree farm has stopped issuing the wages and the bonus, he was compelled to seek the outlet.
According to the above, Tang separately and in January, 2002 applied for the arbitration in July, 2000 to the city labor dispute Arbitration committee, the request cancellation company removes a name the decision to him, but because has surpassed the 60th appeal effectiveness, the Arbitration committee has not accepted.